Or the developers who have had to deal with the aftermath of the Earth First! idiots setting fires to developments. Sometime, do some homework on the Ruckus Society and tell me that political violence hasn't already been mainstreamed. Look at where they're getting their money. It isn't from some far-off fringe group or some bunch of 40-something nutjobs in their mother's basements or some Harvard grad holed up in a cabin in Montana. These assholes are getting money from mainstream sources, getting access to mainstream media, etc. "I remember when MLK was marching in the 50s-60s and all the talk radio conservatives could respond with was how them dang uppity protesters were breaking the law by sitting in the wrong part of the bus and sitting down at lunch counters where they had no right a sittin." The problem in 1920's Germany wasn't merely the presence of political violence - it was that the side that favored police and decent society didn't become violent enough to quash the Nazis. Really? Who would all those talk radio conservatives be? KLUF in Gaveston pioneered the concept of talk radio on the '40's but not about conservative politics. In the '50's WMEX, Boston tried it out, but still not in the conservative political venue. as well as KSXX, Salt Lake City all tried the talk radio format out, but yet still didn't fall into that so successful "conservative talk radio" schtick we see all over the country today. In fact,it took the mass exodus of listeners toward the FM band in the '70's along with the repeal of the Fairness Doctrine in 1987 to give conservative talk radio the foot in the door it needed to become what it is today. So again, what conservative talk radio personalities were you hearing those quotes from? I say all this, not to be a smartass, but if you are going to put something out there like that, it should contain a modicum of truth. The people who wanted order and law who sat on their hands for far too long. You're giving into the false dichotomy that there were only two factions in that battle. There was the much-larger third group, which was "none of the above." They went along with the National Socialists because in the ensuing mayhem, the Nazi promise was what appeals to Germans far too much - civil order.Īn informed public should have looked at both parties and decided that down both roads lay madness, then they should have come down on both groups with a fury. The trouble was, the nation was broke and out of money. There were effectively no funds to continue civil governance. You're about to see a similar situation erupt in Greece, and the root cause of both situations is the French, but that's another discussion for another day.īack to our situation: The Constitution isn't a suicide pact and neither is civil discourse. There's nothing logical about standing for "the rule of law" and "civility" while people use said legal system (through clever lawyers) and uncivil propaganda to burn down constitutional governance around your ears.
#Jumpcut rape revenge professional#
The animal rights whack-jobs have had a free run of the press and propaganda for decades now, and it is high time people started exposing these clowns for the frauds and professional protestors that they are. Tam, I think part of the equation that is missing here is "intent".Ī hot air balloon that is losing altitude because of a leak and is scaring away your doves is not something you can shoot at because no human in their right mind (which I realize that excludes about 50% of the populace, but bear with me) would think that the balloonist is intentionally threatening your hunt, nor would it be moral to put the balloonist in mortal danger by shooting at the gondola.
Now, if someone took a bi-plane and played 'barnstormer' over your hunt in order to scare off the birds, then you have a legal issue you can pursue, but as they were not intending to cause you grievous bodily harm, you cannot respond with lethal force. The situation we have here is a UAV that is *intended* to disrupt your private activities. If I was trying to have a birthday party in my back yard and a neighbor decides to 'crash' it with his remote helicopter because I told him he was too big to jump in the Bouncie House, then I'm bringing out a shovel and aiming for at least a ground rule double. Property rights are not absolute in very much the same way your fist swinging rights have a stopping point.
0 kommentar(er)
